This site uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site,
while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.
For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
This person has a SecurePRO™ card. Because this person is not a ProZ.com Plus subscriber, to view his or her SecurePRO™ card you must be a ProZ.com Business member or Plus subscriber.
Afiliaciones
This person is not affiliated with any business or Blue Board record at ProZ.com.
inglés al indonesio - Tarifas: 0.20 - 0.30 USD por palabra / 20 - 30 USD por hora indonesio al inglés - Tarifas: 0.20 - 0.30 USD por palabra / 20 - 30 USD por hora neerlandés al inglés - Tarifas: 0.20 - 0.30 USD por palabra / 20 - 30 USD por hora malayo al inglés - Tarifas: 0.20 - 0.30 USD por palabra / 20 - 30 USD por hora francés al inglés - Tarifas: 0.20 - 0.30 USD por palabra / 20 - 30 USD por hora
alemán al inglés - Tarifas: 0.20 - 0.30 USD por palabra / 20 - 30 USD por hora portugués al inglés - Tarifas: 0.20 - 0.30 USD por palabra / 20 - 30 USD por hora latín al inglés - Tarifas: 0.20 - 0.30 USD por palabra / 20 - 30 USD por hora tagalo al inglés - Tarifas: 0.20 - 0.30 USD por palabra / 20 - 30 USD por hora español al inglés - Tarifas: 0.20 - 0.30 USD por palabra / 20 - 30 USD por hora
More
Less
Payment methods accepted
PayPal
Muestrario
Muestras de traducción: 8
inglés al indonesio: “Law Enforcement” Detailed field: Derecho: (general)
Texto de origen - inglés Laws are includes coded rules and un-coded rules. In some law’s definition just described laws made by government institution. Just to correction to people image about laws. Laws have basic components. Laws basic components are laws subject, laws object, laws did, sanction or punishment of laws, the effect of sanction or punishment, and justice value.
Laws subject are person or non-person who make laws did. Person is human, and non-person such as corporation or unity or company or institution or organization who have laws body.
Object of laws are all object thing that related with laws did. If laws make laws did so there must be an object or more than a laws objects.
Sanction or punishment is all consequent of laws did. It had aims to punish or warn.
The effect of sanction or punishment must have regret values. Regret values are hoped can give good evolution to the guilty subject.
Justice values needed to establish law aims with its proportion. Justice is main aims to get in law making and laws enforcement.
Traducción - indonesio Hukum adalah aturan yang terdiri dari aturan tertulis dan aturan yang tidak tertulis. Dalam beberapa definisi hukum dibuat oleh lembaga pemerintah. Hanya untuk mengoreksi gambaran orang tentang hukum. Hukum memiliki komponen dasar. komponen dasar dari hukum adalah subjek hukum, objek hukum, hukum itu sendiri, sanksi atau hukuman hukum, pengaruh sanksi atau hukuman, dan nilai keadilan.
Subjek hukum adalah orang atau non-orang yang melakukan sebuah perbuatan hukum. Orang adalah manusia, dan non-orang seperti perusahaan atau kesatuan atau perusahaan atau lembaga atau organisasi yang memiliki kegiatan hukum.
Obyek hukum adalah semua hal obyek yang berhubungan dengan hukum itu. Jika hukum terjadi perbuatan hukum pasti ada sebuah obyek atau lebih dari objek hukum.
Sanksi atau hukuman adalah seluruh konsekuensi hukum itu sendiri. Sanksi bertujuan untuk menghukum atau memperingatkan.
Efek dari sanksi atau hukuman harus memiliki nilai-nilai penyesalan. Nilai Penyesalan diharapkan dapat memberikan perubahan kearah yang baik untuk subjek bersalah.
Nilai-nilai keadilan diperlukan untuk membuat tujuan hukum sesuai dengan proporsinya. Keadilan adalah tujuan utama untuk mendapatkan dalam pembuatan hukum dan penegakan hukum.
portugués al inglés: "Pagwawasto sa Legalidad Prinsipyo" Detailed field: Derecho: (general)
Texto de origen - portugués "Pagwawasto sa Legalidad Prinsipyo"
Author: sa Arif Basukianto, SH
Ang legalidad prinsipyo ay isang prinsipyo sa batas kung saan ang isang tao ay maaaring judged kapag ang kanyang mga kasalanan ay pinasiyahan bago ang kanyang kasalanan ay sa pamamagitan ng kanya. Ang isang pulutong ng mga bansa ay ang konsepto ito bilang batayang tuntunin sa kanilang batas.
Prinsipyo na ito ay ginagamit sa karaniwang mga kaso at maging isang pangunahing paraan upang mahanap ang katotohanan. Maaaring sila ay kalimutan tungkol sa mga konsepto ng katotohanan ay kailangan ng isang makatarungang. Ang makatarungang ay maaaring gawin kung bawat nagkasala ay pinaandar sa pamamagitan ng isang karapatang parusa. Kapag ang nagkasala ay "upang hindi na hawakan" o sa ibang salita ay hindi ibinigay na parusa, ito ay tinatawag na makatarungang? Hayaan ng suriin ang isang sample, kung ang isang pagpatay ay hindi pinasiyahan at ang biktima ay patay, kung saan mamamatay-tao ay hindi ibinigay na kaparusahan dahil doon ay walang mga patakaran tungkol dito, ito makatarungan sa ang biktima? Patas sa biktima ang pamilya? Makatarungang sa ang konsepto ng katotohanan? Ang huling pangungusap dialectic, ito ang isang layunin na parusa na ibinigay sa ang mamamatay-tao? Mayroong hindi patas na ginawa na gumagawa ng isang buhay ng isang tao dulo, at ang mga gumagawa ay hindi parusahan dahil doon ay hindi magkaroon ng mga patakaran nito. Ito ay hindi na paraan upang mahanap ang katotohanan na maaaring magdala ng patas sa lahat.
Makatarungang ay layunin ng isang ay, ang hukom ay dapat magkaroon ng iba pang mga dahilan sa isang katarungan. Sa pagkakataong ito kukunin ko na tumatagal ng isang pagwawasto tungkol sa prinsipyo ng legalidad.
Sila ay maraming mga pangunahing mga tuntunin ng mga batas, doon ay tulad ng:
a. Batas patakaran
Batas patakaran ay ang mga prinsipyo na ginawa sa pamamagitan ng pamahalaan na tapusin ang tungkol sa kung ano ang dapat sundin at kung ano ay limitado sa mga tao sa isang bansa, kung saan may kapahintulutan / parusa sa ginagawang kondisyon ng lipunan upang maging armonya, kapayapaan, at patas.
b. Jurisprudences
Jurisprudences ang mga solusyon na ginawa sa pamamagitan ng hukom sa nakalipas na nagiging ilang mga pangunahing patakaran upang makakuha ng solusyon para sa ilang mga kaso. Ang mga kaso ay karaniwang katulad na mga kaso. Jurisprudences ay ginagamit kung sa hukuman natagpuan ng ilang mga katulad na mga kaso kung saan mahirap na hukom batay sa batas patakaran.
c. Doktrina
Doktrina ay mga opinyon mula sa dalubhasa sa batas. Batas dalubhasa ay may karapatan upang punan ang kanilang mga opinyon sa malutas ang isang kaso. Sino na makakatulong sa hukom kung hindi batas dalubhasa?
d. Kaugalian
Kaugalian ay kung ano ang mga tao ay karaniwang, maging ito mga tuntunin na ginamit upang malutas ang kaso. Kaugalian lamang magbigay ng kapahintulutan. Kaugalian ay hindi ang "matalim" kaysa sa mga batas patakaran.
e. International Costumes
International costumes ang mga patakaran na ginawa sa pamamagitan ng mga bansa upang malutas ang internasyonal na problema na batay sa mga karaniwang panig.
f. Batas researches
Batas researches ang mga alituntunin ng batas ang gumagawa mula sa malalim na pananaliksik. Ito kailangan ng malalim na pag-aralan mula sa mga kaugnay na paksa.
Sa mga saklaw ng batas karaniwang nilikha upang malutas ang mga kaso upang mabigyan ng katarungan sa lahat ng paksa, sila ay tapusin nagkasala tagagawa at biktima. Batas ay hindi maaaring ang subjective solusyon, lamang lamang humawak isang paksa. Ito ay dapat na layunin solusyon.
Legalidad Prinsipyo Main
Ayon Roelof H Haveman "Batas, Retroactivity, ang Lex Certa, at pagkakatulad bagaman maaaring ito ay sinabi na hindi aspeto bawat ay malakas na sa kanyang sarili, ang kumbinasyon ng apat na aspeto nagbibigay ng isang mas tunay na kahulugan sa prinsipyo ng legalidad sa batas". Kaya parusa ay dapat binubuo ng lahat ng mga kaugnay na aspeto. Lahat ng mga aspeto ay dapat isaalang-alang sa hukom sa ginawa batas.
a. Batas
Buhay ay dynamic, ang lahat ng pagbabago upang mabilis. Sa mga tao sa lipunan, may pagbabago at pagbabago ng isang bagay. Dahil ang mga pangangailangan ng tao ay malawak at maraming. Kaya ay sa batas, ito ay dapat na patakaran ang lahat na pagbabago. Ang batas ay hindi pa kumpleto ang bahagi ngunit muling itayo ito upang maging kumpletong pangunahing patakaran sa pantao buhay. Sa batas proseso ay hindi lamang makipag-usap tungkol sa kung ano ay nakasulat sa mga patakaran, ngunit isinasaalang-alang din kung ano ay hindi nakasulat sa mga patakaran.
b. Retroactivity
Retroactivity ay kondisyon na kung saan ang mga batas ay hindi ginagamit upang Rule bilang retroactivity kondisyon. Sa ilang mga kaso minsan nakita namin retroactivity ginawa. Ito inilarawan retroactivity ginamit upang malutas sa tiyak na mga kaso. Hukom ginawa ito upang bumuo ng katarungan sa talaga.
Para sa mga kaso sangkatauhan tulad ng pagpatay ng lahi, walang-retroactivity ay hindi maaaring gamitin upang malutas ang problema. Ito ay dapat na isaalang-alang ang lahat ng aspeto na may kaugnayan sa kaso.
c. Lex Certa
Lahat ng batas ay kailangang gumawa sa kanan at malinaw interpretations. Kung batas na ginawa sa hindi malinaw na interpretasyon (abstractly kahulugan), ang batas ay magiging interpretasyon sa pamamagitan ng mga bahagi ng batas subjectively, lahat nakasalalay ang kanilang sariling interpretasyon. Walang talaga.
Batas na ginawa upang mahanap ang malinaw na kundisyon, sa pagitan ng "itim" at "puting". Ito ang dahilan kung bakit ang batas ay dapat may malinaw na kahulugan.
d. Pagkakatulad
Pagkakatulad dapat gawin para sa mga bahagi ng batas upang gumawa ng solusyon sa batas. Ang solusyon ay talaga bagay.
Pangunahing bahagi sa batas ang mga patakaran at katotohanan. Pareho ng mga ito ay dapat isaalang-alang ang katarungan halaga. Kung sa mga kaso napatunayang may kasalanan na hindi ay pinasiyahan ng bago, kaya hukom ay dapat isaalang-alang ang tungkol sa iba pang mga halaga, tulad ng katotohanan; kondisyon; motibo; makatarungang; at sangkatauhan.
Dahil ng legalidad na mga prinsipyo ay hindi maaaring magamit sa mga harmfully. Ang batas ay nangangailangan ng mga kaugnay na mga elemento upang bigyan ng solusyon sa lutasin ang kaso. Hindi lamang naka-book na teksto, ngunit dapat isaalang-alang ang lahat ng mga halaga. Umaasa kami na batas ay maaaring maging isang pangkalahatang pangangailangan para sa tao, dahil ang function na batas ay para sa mga tao kabutihan. Mabuhay katarungan!
Traducción - inglés “Correction to Legality Principle”
Author: Arif Basukianto, SH
Legality principle is a principle in law where someone can be judged when his fault is ruled before his fault did by him. A lot of countries are concept it as base rule in their law. This principle is used in common cases and become a basic way to find the truth. They may be forget about the truth concept is need a fair. A fair can be made if every guilty is executed by a right punishment. When the guilty is being “to not touch” or in other words is not given a punishment, is it called fair? Let’s check a sample, if a murder hasn’t ruled and the victim is dead, where the murderer is not given a punishment because there are no rules about it, is it fair to the victim? Is it fair to the family’s victim? Is it fair to the truth concept? The last dialectic sentence, is it an objective punishment given to the murderer? There is unfair did that makes a life of someone end, and the makers has not punished because there is not have a rules of it. It not way to find the truth that can bring a fair to all. Fair is an objective did, judge must have other reason to a justice. In this opportunity I’ll takes a correction about the legality principle.
They are many basic rule of laws, there are in such as:
a. Laws rules
Laws rules are principles that made by government that conclude about what must be obey and what are restricted to people in a country, where there is sanction/ punishment to makes society condition to become harmony, peace, and fair.
b. Jurisprudences
Jurisprudences are solutions made by judges in the past that becomes some basic rules to get solution for some cases. The cases are usually similar cases. Jurisprudences used if in court found some similar cases where it difficult to judge based on laws rules.
c. Doctrines
Doctrines are opinions from law expert. Law expert have the right to fill out their opinion to solve a case. Who that help the judge if not law expert?
d. Norms
Norms are what people did usually, it become rules that used to solve cases. Norms just give sanction. Norms are not “sharp” than laws rules.
e. International Costumes
International costumes are rules that made by countries to solve international problem based on usually sides.
f. Laws researches
Laws researches are law rules are making from deeply research. It need deeply analyze from related subject.
In law jurisdictions usually created to solve cases to give justice in all subject, they are conclude guilty maker and victim. Laws can not subjective solution, just only hold one subject. It must objective solutions.
Legality Principles Main
According Roelof H Haveman “Law, Retroactivity, Lex Certa, and Analogy though it might be said that not every aspect is that strong on its own, the combination of the four aspects gives a more true meaning to principle of legality in laws”. So a punishment must consist of all related aspects. All aspects must be considered to judge in made laws.
a. Law
Life is dynamic, everything change so fast. In people society, there is something change and change. Because the human needs are wide and lot. So did with the law, it must rule everything that change. Law is not complete component but it rebuild to become complete basic rule on human life. In law process is not only talk about what are written on rules, but also considered what are not written on rules.
b. Retroactivity
Retroactivity is condition where laws are not being used to rule as retroactivity condition. In some cases sometimes we found retroactivity did. It described retroactivity used to solve to certainly cases. Judges did it to build up the justice with objectively.
For humanity cases such genocide, non-retroactivity are can not be used to solve the problem. It must consider all aspects related with the case.
c. Lex Certa
All laws must make with right and clearly interpretations. If law made with not clearly interpretation (abstractly meaning), law will be interpretation by law components subjectively, all depend their own interpretation. There is no objectively.
Law made to find clearly condition, between “black” and “white”. It’s the reason why law must have clearly meaning.
d. Analogy
Analogy must do for law components to make law solution. The solution is objectively thing.
Main component in law are rule and fact. Both of them must consider justice value. If in the cases found guilty that’s has not ruled before, so judge must consider about other value, such as truth; condition; motive; fair; and humanity.
Because of that legality principles can not be used with harmfully. Law needs related elements to give solution in solve case. Not only text booked, but must consider all values. We hope law can be a general needs for human, because law’s function is for human kindness. Viva justice!
neerlandés al inglés: "Correctie op Legaliteits Beginsel" Detailed field: Derecho: (general)
Texto de origen - neerlandés "Correctie op Legaliteits Beginsel"
Auteur: Arif Basukianto, SH
Legaliteits Beginsel is een principe in de wet waar iemand kan worden beoordeeld wanneer zijn schuld is uitgesloten voor zijn fout door Hem gedaan heeft. Veel landen zijn concept van het als regel op in hun wetgeving. Dit principe wordt gebruikt in voorkomende gevallen en uitgegroeid tot een fundamentele manier om de waarheid te vinden. Ze zijn misschien vergeten de waarheid concept is behoefte aan een beurs. Een beurs kan worden gemaakt als elke schuldig wordt uitgevoerd door een juiste straf. Wanneer de schuldige wordt "om niet aan te raken" of met andere woorden wordt niet gegeven een straf, wordt het genoemd eerlijk? Laten we eens kijken een monster, als er een moord is niet uitgesloten en het slachtoffer is dood, waar de moordenaar wordt niet gegeven een straf omdat er geen regels over, is het eerlijk om het slachtoffer? Is het eerlijk om het slachtoffer van de familie? Is het eerlijk om de waarheid concept? De laatste dialectiek zin, is het een objectieve straf gegeven aan de moordenaar? Er is oneerlijk deed dat maakt het leven van iemand einde, en de makers is niet gestraft omdat er geen regels van. Het is niet weg naar de waarheid, dat een eerlijke kan brengen om allemaal te vinden. Fair is een objectieve hebben, een rechter moet andere reden om een rechtvaardigheid. In deze gelegenheid zal ik vindt een correctie over het legaliteitsbeginsel.
Ze zijn veel eenvoudige regel van wetten, zijn er in zoals:
a. Wetten regels
Wetten regels zijn principes die door de overheid, dat concluderen over wat er moet gehoorzamen en wat zijn beperkt tot mensen in een land, waar sprake is van sanctie / straf zo aan dat de maatschappij staat te worden harmonie, vrede, en eerlijk.
b. Rechtspraak zo
Rechtspraak zo zijn oplossingen gemaakt door rechters in het verleden, dat wordt een aantal basisregels om de oplossing te krijgen voor sommige gevallen. De cases zijn meestal vergelijkbare gevallen. Rechtspraak zo gebruikt als in de rechtbank vond een aantal soortgelijke gevallen waarin het moeilijk te beoordelen op basis van wettelijke regels.
c. Doctrines
Doctrines zijn de beoordelingen uit de wet expert. Wet deskundige heeft het recht in te vullen hun mening om een zaak op te lossen. Wie die helpen bij de rechter, zo niet de wet expert?
d. Normen
Normen zijn wat mensen meestal was, het uitgegroeid tot regels die gebruikt worden om zaken op te lossen. Normen geef sanctie. Normen zijn niet "scherp" zijn dan wettelijke regels.
e. International Kostuums
International kostuums zijn regels die van de landen aan de internationale probleem op basis van meestal kanten op te lossen.
f. Wetten onderzoeken
Wetten onderzoeken zijn rechtsregels maken van diep onderzoek. Het hoeft diepgaand te analyseren en uit verwante onderwerp.
In law meestal gemaakt om zaken op te lossen tot de rechter te geven in alle onderwerp, zijn ze concluderen schuldig maker en het slachtoffer. Wetten kunnen subjectieve oplossing niet, maar net past een onderwerp. Het moet objectieve oplossingen.
Rechtmatigheid Principes Main
Volgens Roelof Haveman H "Law, Terugwerkende kracht, Lex Certa, en analogie al kan gezegd worden dat niet elk aspect is dat sterk op zijn eigen, de combinatie van de vier aspecten geeft een ware betekenis te legaliteitsbeginsel in wetten". Dus een straf moet bestaan uit alle daaraan gerelateerde aspecten. Alle aspecten moeten worden beschouwd om te oordelen in gemaakte wetten.
a. Wet
Het leven is dynamisch, alles veranderen zo snel. Bij mensen de maatschappij, is er iets veranderen en verandering. Omdat de menselijke behoeften zijn breed en veel. Dus heeft met de wet, moet het zich uitspreken alles wat verandering. Wet is niet compleet component, maar het weer op te bouwen om volledige basisregel op het menselijke leven te worden. In de wet-proces is niet alleen praten over wat daar op geschreven regels, maar ook worden beschouwd wat niet geschreven op de regels.
b. Terugwerkende kracht
Terugwerkende kracht is voorwaarde waar wetten niet worden gebruikt om te heersen als terugwerkende kracht staat. In sommige gevallen soms vonden we terugwerkende kracht gedaan. Het beschreven retroactiviteit gebruikt lossen zeker gevallen. Rechters deden het om de opbouw van de gerechtigheid met de objectief.
In menselijke gevallen genocide zijn niet-retroactiviteit kan niet worden gebruikt om het probleem op te lossen. Het moet rekening houden met alle aspecten in verband met de zaak.
c. Lex Certa
Alle wetten moeten maken met recht en duidelijk interpretaties. Als de wet gemaakt met niet duidelijk interpretatie (abstract betekenis), wet subjectief uitlegging door de wet componenten, allemaal afhankelijk van hun eigen interpretatie. Er is geen objectief.
Wet gemaakt om duidelijk staat te vinden, tussen "zwarte" en "wit". Het is de reden waarom de wet moet duidelijk betekenis.
d. Analogie
Analogie moet doen voor de wet componenten met de wet oplossing. De oplossing is objectief ding.
Belangrijkste onderdeel van de wet zijn regel en feit. Beiden moet rekening houden met rechtvaardigheid waarde. Indien in de gevallen schuldig bevonden dat is nog niet eerder heeft uitgesproken, moet zo rechter te overwegen over andere waarde, zoals waarheid, conditie; motief, eerlijke, en de mensheid.
Daardoor rechtmatigheid principes kunnen worden gebruikt nadelig. Wet moet gerelateerde elementen om de oplossing te geven op te lossen geval. Niet alleen tekst geboekt, maar moet rekening houden met alle waarden. We hopen dat de wet kan een algemene behoefte aan personele, omdat de wet de functie is voor de menselijke goedheid. Viva rechtvaardigheid!
Traducción - inglés “Correction to Legality Principle”
Author: Arif Basukianto, SH
Legality principle is a principle in law where someone can be judged when his fault is ruled before his fault did by him. A lot of countries are concept it as base rule in their law. This principle is used in common cases and become a basic way to find the truth. They may be forget about the truth concept is need a fair. A fair can be made if every guilty is executed by a right punishment. When the guilty is being “to not touch” or in other words is not given a punishment, is it called fair? Let’s check a sample, if a murder hasn’t ruled and the victim is dead, where the murderer is not given a punishment because there are no rules about it, is it fair to the victim? Is it fair to the family’s victim? Is it fair to the truth concept? The last dialectic sentence, is it an objective punishment given to the murderer? There is unfair did that makes a life of someone end, and the makers has not punished because there is not have a rules of it. It not way to find the truth that can bring a fair to all. Fair is an objective did, judge must have other reason to a justice. In this opportunity I’ll takes a correction about the legality principle.
They are many basic rule of laws, there are in such as:
a. Laws rules
Laws rules are principles that made by government that conclude about what must be obey and what are restricted to people in a country, where there is sanction/ punishment to makes society condition to become harmony, peace, and fair.
b. Jurisprudences
Jurisprudences are solutions made by judges in the past that becomes some basic rules to get solution for some cases. The cases are usually similar cases. Jurisprudences used if in court found some similar cases where it difficult to judge based on laws rules.
c. Doctrines
Doctrines are opinions from law expert. Law expert have the right to fill out their opinion to solve a case. Who that help the judge if not law expert?
d. Norms
Norms are what people did usually, it become rules that used to solve cases. Norms just give sanction. Norms are not “sharp” than laws rules.
e. International Costumes
International costumes are rules that made by countries to solve international problem based on usually sides.
f. Laws researches
Laws researches are law rules are making from deeply research. It need deeply analyze from related subject.
In law jurisdictions usually created to solve cases to give justice in all subject, they are conclude guilty maker and victim. Laws can not subjective solution, just only hold one subject. It must objective solutions.
Legality Principles Main
According Roelof H Haveman “Law, Retroactivity, Lex Certa, and Analogy though it might be said that not every aspect is that strong on its own, the combination of the four aspects gives a more true meaning to principle of legality in laws”. So a punishment must consist of all related aspects. All aspects must be considered to judge in made laws.
a. Law
Life is dynamic, everything change so fast. In people society, there is something change and change. Because the human needs are wide and lot. So did with the law, it must rule everything that change. Law is not complete component but it rebuild to become complete basic rule on human life. In law process is not only talk about what are written on rules, but also considered what are not written on rules.
b. Retroactivity
Retroactivity is condition where laws are not being used to rule as retroactivity condition. In some cases sometimes we found retroactivity did. It described retroactivity used to solve to certainly cases. Judges did it to build up the justice with objectively.
For humanity cases such genocide, non-retroactivity are can not be used to solve the problem. It must consider all aspects related with the case.
c. Lex Certa
All laws must make with right and clearly interpretations. If law made with not clearly interpretation (abstractly meaning), law will be interpretation by law components subjectively, all depend their own interpretation. There is no objectively.
Law made to find clearly condition, between “black” and “white”. It’s the reason why law must have clearly meaning.
d. Analogy
Analogy must do for law components to make law solution. The solution is objectively thing.
Main component in law are rule and fact. Both of them must consider justice value. If in the cases found guilty that’s has not ruled before, so judge must consider about other value, such as truth; condition; motive; fair; and humanity.
Because of that legality principles can not be used with harmfully. Law needs related elements to give solution in solve case. Not only text booked, but must consider all values. We hope law can be a general needs for human, because law’s function is for human kindness. Viva justice!
indonesio al inglés: "Penegakan Hukum" Detailed field: Derecho: (general)
Texto de origen - indonesio "Penegakan Hukum"
Penulis: Arif Basukianto, SH
Hukum adalah aturan yang terdiri dari aturan tertulis dan aturan yang tidak tertulis. Dalam beberapa definisi hukum dibuat oleh lembaga pemerintah. Hanya untuk mengoreksi gambaran orang tentang hukum. Hukum memiliki komponen dasar. komponen dasar dari hukum adalah subjek hukum, objek hukum, hukum itu sendiri, sanksi atau hukuman hukum, pengaruh sanksi atau hukuman, dan nilai keadilan.
Subjek hukum adalah orang atau non-orang yang melakukan sebuah perbuatan hukum. Orang adalah manusia, dan non-orang seperti perusahaan atau kesatuan atau perusahaan atau lembaga atau organisasi yang memiliki kegiatan hukum.
Obyek hukum adalah semua hal obyek yang berhubungan dengan hukum itu. Jika hukum terjadi perbuatan hukum pasti ada sebuah obyek atau lebih dari objek hukum.
Sanksi atau hukuman adalah seluruh konsekuensi hukum itu sendiri. Sanksi bertujuan untuk menghukum atau memperingatkan.
Efek dari sanksi atau hukuman harus memiliki nilai-nilai penyesalan. Nilai Penyesalan diharapkan dapat memberikan perubahan kearah yang baik untuk subjek bersalah.
Nilai-nilai keadilan diperlukan untuk membuat tujuan hukum sesuai dengan proporsinya. Keadilan adalah tujuan utama untuk mendapatkan dalam pembuatan hukum dan penegakan hukum.
Pembuatan Penegakan Hukum
Berbicara tentang penegakan hukum, kita harus berbicara tentang langkah awal dan langkah terakhir.
Penegakan hukum merupakan upaya yang tersistem yang menciptakan yurisdiksi hukum. Hukum yang dibangun tidak hanya cara menangani tetapi juga cara mencegah. Apa yang kita lihat, apabila undang-undang tidak memiliki upaya penegakan yang baik? Untuk menjawab itu, ia harus berhubungan dengan penegakan hukum yang akhir yaitu keputusan.
Yang mendapatkan tugas penegakan hukum? Mereka adalah pemerintah dan masyarakat. Keduanya harus memiliki kerja sama yang baik untuk menangani masalah hukum dan untuk mencegah masalah hukum yang terjadi. Banyak orang mengira bahwa pemerintah adalah pemain utama dalam hal ini. Secara nyata, para pemain utama adalah dua-duanya. Mereka tidak bisa dipisahkan.
Hukum adalah pedoman hidup masyarakat. Hukum membuat oleh orang, dari orang, dan untuk orang.
Proses Penegakan Hukum
Pada bagian ini kita akan bercerita tentang proses penegakan hukum. Ini harus diketahui oleh semua orang karena tidak semua orang kenal dengan hukum. Bahkan hukum bersifat "fictie" atau hukum dianggap bahwa semua oranga mengetahuinya. Semua pembelaan orang untuk tidak berkompromi dengan hukum dikategorikan dengan perbuatan yang tidak mematuhi hukum.
Berdasarkan kenyataannya, proses penegakan hukum terbagi ke dalam:
a. Pra-Kondisi
Kondisi yang terdiri dari pembuatan hukum, motif hukum, dan cara-cara mencegah. Kondisi sebelum kejahatan terjadi harus dianalisis oleh para ahli hukum. Jika kita bisa mendapatkan gambaran sebelum kejahatan terjadi kita akan tahu mengapa kejahatan terjadi. Kita akan tahu motif, dan harus mendapatkan solusi untuk mencegah agar kejahatan dapat turun menjadi minim. Kita harus mencegah kejahatan yang akan terus terjadi di masa depan. Jika kita menemukan kasus serupa, kita bisa mendapatkan jurisprudensi.
Pembuat hukum harus mempertimbangkan hukum dibuat untuk mendapatkan solusi dari masalah, tidak malah mempersulit masalah yang timbul. Mereka harus belajar bahwa mengapa aturan tidak ditaati. Jika semua kondisi dianalisis untuk menemukan cara untuk menegakkan hukum, kita akan melihat dasar dari pembuatan hukum adalah mendapatkan produk hukum yang baik.
Penegakan harus dilakukan secara dini. Apakah kita menginginkan masalah? Tentu tidak. Orang ingin kehidupan yang baik pada dasarnya.
Dalam menangani, interogasi; investigasi diperlukan untuk menganalisis kasus. Jika kita memiliki komponen dasar dari proses-proses tersebut, menjadi awal dari kebenaran.
b. Pada Kondisi
Kondisi di mana kejahatan terjadi pada, perlu investigasi juga. Langkah ini akan membandingkan fakta dengan apa yang ada pada aturan. Perbandingan dibutuhkan untuk mendapatkan kebenaran triangulasi. Ini digunakan untuk proses penuntutan di pengadilan.
Fakta terbagimenjadi dua bagian, mereka adalah fakta yang terjadi dan fakta dalam aturan. Ini bagian dasar yang harus diketahui pertama kali dalam proses penegakan hukum.
c. Setelah-Kondisi
Setelah-kondisi adalah kondisi terakhir di mana kejahatan dinilai di pengadilan, di mana jaksa menuntut tersangka. Hukuman akan diberikan kepada tersangka. Apakah dia menjadi bersalah atau tidak bersalah.
Jika seseorang disebut bersalah ia akan mendapatkan hukuman atas kejahatannya. Jika dia tidak bersalah, ia akan membebaskan dari segala tuntutan kepadanya.
Setelah-kondisi tidak hanya pembuktian yang akhir, tetapi juga meliputi hukuman. Ingat hukuman adalah konsekuensi atas kejahatan yang dibuat. Jadi jangan mencoba untuk membuat kejahatan!
Kejahatan terjadi bukan hanya terjadi karena ada kejahatan, tetapi juga ada kesempatan untuk melakukan kejahatan. Hati-hati, mari kita mematuhi aturan. Dalam aturan dasar yang dibuat untuk kebaikan kita. Kejahatan dapat memaksa dan dapat dicegah. Perlu semua komponen masyarakat untuk bekerja sama secara baik dengan pemerintah untuk mendapatkan penegakan hukum yang baik.
Traducción - inglés “Correction to Legality Principle”
Author: Arif Basukianto, SH
Legality principle is a principle in law where someone can be judged when his fault is ruled before his fault did by him. A lot of countries are concept it as base rule in their law. This principle is used in common cases and become a basic way to find the truth. They may be forget about the truth concept is need a fair. A fair can be made if every guilty is executed by a right punishment. When the guilty is being “to not touch” or in other words is not given a punishment, is it called fair? Let’s check a sample, if a murder hasn’t ruled and the victim is dead, where the murderer is not given a punishment because there are no rules about it, is it fair to the victim? Is it fair to the family’s victim? Is it fair to the truth concept? The last dialectic sentence, is it an objective punishment given to the murderer? There is unfair did that makes a life of someone end, and the makers has not punished because there is not have a rules of it. It not way to find the truth that can bring a fair to all. Fair is an objective did, judge must have other reason to a justice. In this opportunity I’ll takes a correction about the legality principle.
They are many basic rule of laws, there are in such as:
a. Laws rules
Laws rules are principles that made by government that conclude about what must be obey and what are restricted to people in a country, where there is sanction/ punishment to makes society condition to become harmony, peace, and fair.
b. Jurisprudences
Jurisprudences are solutions made by judges in the past that becomes some basic rules to get solution for some cases. The cases are usually similar cases. Jurisprudences used if in court found some similar cases where it difficult to judge based on laws rules.
c. Doctrines
Doctrines are opinions from law expert. Law expert have the right to fill out their opinion to solve a case. Who that help the judge if not law expert?
d. Norms
Norms are what people did usually, it become rules that used to solve cases. Norms just give sanction. Norms are not “sharp” than laws rules.
e. International Costumes
International costumes are rules that made by countries to solve international problem based on usually sides.
f. Laws researches
Laws researches are law rules are making from deeply research. It need deeply analyze from related subject.
In law jurisdictions usually created to solve cases to give justice in all subject, they are conclude guilty maker and victim. Laws can not subjective solution, just only hold one subject. It must objective solutions.
Legality Principles Main
According Roelof H Haveman “Law, Retroactivity, Lex Certa, and Analogy though it might be said that not every aspect is that strong on its own, the combination of the four aspects gives a more true meaning to principle of legality in laws”. So a punishment must consist of all related aspects. All aspects must be considered to judge in made laws.
a. Law
Life is dynamic, everything change so fast. In people society, there is something change and change. Because the human needs are wide and lot. So did with the law, it must rule everything that change. Law is not complete component but it rebuild to become complete basic rule on human life. In law process is not only talk about what are written on rules, but also considered what are not written on rules.
b. Retroactivity
Retroactivity is condition where laws are not being used to rule as retroactivity condition. In some cases sometimes we found retroactivity did. It described retroactivity used to solve to certainly cases. Judges did it to build up the justice with objectively.
For humanity cases such genocide, non-retroactivity are can not be used to solve the problem. It must consider all aspects related with the case.
c. Lex Certa
All laws must make with right and clearly interpretations. If law made with not clearly interpretation (abstractly meaning), law will be interpretation by law components subjectively, all depend their own interpretation. There is no objectively.
Law made to find clearly condition, between “black” and “white”. It’s the reason why law must have clearly meaning.
d. Analogy
Analogy must do for law components to make law solution. The solution is objectively thing.
Main component in law are rule and fact. Both of them must consider justice value. If in the cases found guilty that’s has not ruled before, so judge must consider about other value, such as truth; condition; motive; fair; and humanity.
Because of that legality principles can not be used with harmfully. Law needs related elements to give solution in solve case. Not only text booked, but must consider all values. We hope law can be a general needs for human, because law’s function is for human kindness. Viva justice!
malayo al inglés: "Penegakan Hukum" Detailed field: Derecho: (general)
Texto de origen - malayo "Penegakan Hukum"
Penulis: Arif Basukianto, SH
Hukum adalah aturan yang terdiri dari aturan tertulis dan aturan yang tidak tertulis. Dalam beberapa definisi hukum dibuat oleh lembaga pemerintah. Hanya untuk mengoreksi gambaran orang tentang hukum. Hukum memiliki komponen dasar. komponen dasar dari hukum adalah subjek hukum, objek hukum, hukum itu sendiri, sanksi atau hukuman hukum, pengaruh sanksi atau hukuman, dan nilai keadilan.
Subjek hukum adalah orang atau non-orang yang melakukan sebuah perbuatan hukum. Orang adalah manusia, dan non-orang seperti perusahaan atau kesatuan atau perusahaan atau lembaga atau organisasi yang memiliki kegiatan hukum.
Obyek hukum adalah semua hal obyek yang berhubungan dengan hukum itu. Jika hukum terjadi perbuatan hukum pasti ada sebuah obyek atau lebih dari objek hukum.
Sanksi atau hukuman adalah seluruh konsekuensi hukum itu sendiri. Sanksi bertujuan untuk menghukum atau memperingatkan.
Efek dari sanksi atau hukuman harus memiliki nilai-nilai penyesalan. Nilai Penyesalan diharapkan dapat memberikan perubahan kearah yang baik untuk subjek bersalah.
Nilai-nilai keadilan diperlukan untuk membuat tujuan hukum sesuai dengan proporsinya. Keadilan adalah tujuan utama untuk mendapatkan dalam pembuatan hukum dan penegakan hukum.
Pembuatan Penegakan Hukum
Berbicara tentang penegakan hukum, kita harus berbicara tentang langkah awal dan langkah terakhir.
Penegakan hukum merupakan upaya yang tersistem yang menciptakan yurisdiksi hukum. Hukum yang dibangun tidak hanya cara menangani tetapi juga cara mencegah. Apa yang kita lihat, apabila undang-undang tidak memiliki upaya penegakan yang baik? Untuk menjawab itu, ia harus berhubungan dengan penegakan hukum yang akhir yaitu keputusan.
Yang mendapatkan tugas penegakan hukum? Mereka adalah pemerintah dan masyarakat. Keduanya harus memiliki kerja sama yang baik untuk menangani masalah hukum dan untuk mencegah masalah hukum yang terjadi. Banyak orang mengira bahwa pemerintah adalah pemain utama dalam hal ini. Secara nyata, para pemain utama adalah dua-duanya. Mereka tidak bisa dipisahkan.
Hukum adalah pedoman hidup masyarakat. Hukum membuat oleh orang, dari orang, dan untuk orang.
Proses Penegakan Hukum
Pada bagian ini kita akan bercerita tentang proses penegakan hukum. Ini harus diketahui oleh semua orang karena tidak semua orang kenal dengan hukum. Bahkan hukum bersifat "fictie" atau hukum dianggap bahwa semua oranga mengetahuinya. Semua pembelaan orang untuk tidak berkompromi dengan hukum dikategorikan dengan perbuatan yang tidak mematuhi hukum.
Berdasarkan kenyataannya, proses penegakan hukum terbagi ke dalam:
a. Pra-Kondisi
Kondisi yang terdiri dari pembuatan hukum, motif hukum, dan cara-cara mencegah. Kondisi sebelum kejahatan terjadi harus dianalisis oleh para ahli hukum. Jika kita bisa mendapatkan gambaran sebelum kejahatan terjadi kita akan tahu mengapa kejahatan terjadi. Kita akan tahu motif, dan harus mendapatkan solusi untuk mencegah agar kejahatan dapat turun menjadi minim. Kita harus mencegah kejahatan yang akan terus terjadi di masa depan. Jika kita menemukan kasus serupa, kita bisa mendapatkan jurisprudensi.
Pembuat hukum harus mempertimbangkan hukum dibuat untuk mendapatkan solusi dari masalah, tidak malah mempersulit masalah yang timbul. Mereka harus belajar bahwa mengapa aturan tidak ditaati. Jika semua kondisi dianalisis untuk menemukan cara untuk menegakkan hukum, kita akan melihat dasar dari pembuatan hukum adalah mendapatkan produk hukum yang baik.
Penegakan harus dilakukan secara dini. Apakah kita menginginkan masalah? Tentu tidak. Orang ingin kehidupan yang baik pada dasarnya.
Dalam menangani, interogasi; investigasi diperlukan untuk menganalisis kasus. Jika kita memiliki komponen dasar dari proses-proses tersebut, menjadi awal dari kebenaran.
b. Pada Kondisi
Kondisi di mana kejahatan terjadi pada, perlu investigasi juga. Langkah ini akan membandingkan fakta dengan apa yang ada pada aturan. Perbandingan dibutuhkan untuk mendapatkan kebenaran triangulasi. Ini digunakan untuk proses penuntutan di pengadilan.
Fakta terbagimenjadi dua bagian, mereka adalah fakta yang terjadi dan fakta dalam aturan. Ini bagian dasar yang harus diketahui pertama kali dalam proses penegakan hukum.
c. Setelah-Kondisi
Setelah-kondisi adalah kondisi terakhir di mana kejahatan dinilai di pengadilan, di mana jaksa menuntut tersangka. Hukuman akan diberikan kepada tersangka. Apakah dia menjadi bersalah atau tidak bersalah.
Jika seseorang disebut bersalah ia akan mendapatkan hukuman atas kejahatannya. Jika dia tidak bersalah, ia akan membebaskan dari segala tuntutan kepadanya.
Setelah-kondisi tidak hanya pembuktian yang akhir, tetapi juga meliputi hukuman. Ingat hukuman adalah konsekuensi atas kejahatan yang dibuat. Jadi jangan mencoba untuk membuat kejahatan!
Kejahatan terjadi bukan hanya terjadi karena ada kejahatan, tetapi juga ada kesempatan untuk melakukan kejahatan. Hati-hati, mari kita mematuhi aturan. Dalam aturan dasar yang dibuat untuk kebaikan kita. Kejahatan dapat memaksa dan dapat dicegah. Perlu semua komponen masyarakat untuk bekerja sama secara baik dengan pemerintah untuk mendapatkan penegakan hukum yang baik.
Traducción - inglés “Correction to Legality Principle”
Author: Arif Basukianto, SH
Legality principle is a principle in law where someone can be judged when his fault is ruled before his fault did by him. A lot of countries are concept it as base rule in their law. This principle is used in common cases and become a basic way to find the truth. They may be forget about the truth concept is need a fair. A fair can be made if every guilty is executed by a right punishment. When the guilty is being “to not touch” or in other words is not given a punishment, is it called fair? Let’s check a sample, if a murder hasn’t ruled and the victim is dead, where the murderer is not given a punishment because there are no rules about it, is it fair to the victim? Is it fair to the family’s victim? Is it fair to the truth concept? The last dialectic sentence, is it an objective punishment given to the murderer? There is unfair did that makes a life of someone end, and the makers has not punished because there is not have a rules of it. It not way to find the truth that can bring a fair to all. Fair is an objective did, judge must have other reason to a justice. In this opportunity I’ll takes a correction about the legality principle.
They are many basic rule of laws, there are in such as:
a. Laws rules
Laws rules are principles that made by government that conclude about what must be obey and what are restricted to people in a country, where there is sanction/ punishment to makes society condition to become harmony, peace, and fair.
b. Jurisprudences
Jurisprudences are solutions made by judges in the past that becomes some basic rules to get solution for some cases. The cases are usually similar cases. Jurisprudences used if in court found some similar cases where it difficult to judge based on laws rules.
c. Doctrines
Doctrines are opinions from law expert. Law expert have the right to fill out their opinion to solve a case. Who that help the judge if not law expert?
d. Norms
Norms are what people did usually, it become rules that used to solve cases. Norms just give sanction. Norms are not “sharp” than laws rules.
e. International Costumes
International costumes are rules that made by countries to solve international problem based on usually sides.
f. Laws researches
Laws researches are law rules are making from deeply research. It need deeply analyze from related subject.
In law jurisdictions usually created to solve cases to give justice in all subject, they are conclude guilty maker and victim. Laws can not subjective solution, just only hold one subject. It must objective solutions.
Legality Principles Main
According Roelof H Haveman “Law, Retroactivity, Lex Certa, and Analogy though it might be said that not every aspect is that strong on its own, the combination of the four aspects gives a more true meaning to principle of legality in laws”. So a punishment must consist of all related aspects. All aspects must be considered to judge in made laws.
a. Law
Life is dynamic, everything change so fast. In people society, there is something change and change. Because the human needs are wide and lot. So did with the law, it must rule everything that change. Law is not complete component but it rebuild to become complete basic rule on human life. In law process is not only talk about what are written on rules, but also considered what are not written on rules.
b. Retroactivity
Retroactivity is condition where laws are not being used to rule as retroactivity condition. In some cases sometimes we found retroactivity did. It described retroactivity used to solve to certainly cases. Judges did it to build up the justice with objectively.
For humanity cases such genocide, non-retroactivity are can not be used to solve the problem. It must consider all aspects related with the case.
c. Lex Certa
All laws must make with right and clearly interpretations. If law made with not clearly interpretation (abstractly meaning), law will be interpretation by law components subjectively, all depend their own interpretation. There is no objectively.
Law made to find clearly condition, between “black” and “white”. It’s the reason why law must have clearly meaning.
d. Analogy
Analogy must do for law components to make law solution. The solution is objectively thing.
Main component in law are rule and fact. Both of them must consider justice value. If in the cases found guilty that’s has not ruled before, so judge must consider about other value, such as truth; condition; motive; fair; and humanity.
Because of that legality principles can not be used with harmfully. Law needs related elements to give solution in solve case. Not only text booked, but must consider all values. We hope law can be a general needs for human, because law’s function is for human kindness. Viva justice!
francés al inglés: "Correction de principe de la légalité" Detailed field: Derecho: (general)
Texto de origen - francés "Correction de principe de la légalité"
Auteur: Arif Basukianto, SH
Principe de légalité est un principe en droit, où une personne peut être jugée lorsque sa faute est exclue avant sa faute a fait par lui. Un grand nombre de pays sont notion comme règle de base dans leur droit. Ce principe est utilisé dans les cas ordinaires et devenir une méthode de base pour trouver la vérité. Ils peuvent être oublier la notion vérité est besoin d'un juste. Un salon peut être faite si tous les coupables est exécuté par une punition à droite. Lorsque le coupable est «de ne pas toucher» ou en d'autres termes n'est pas donné une punition, est-il appelé juste? Allons voir un échantillon, si un assassiner n'a pas statué et la victime est morte, où le meurtrier n'est pas donné une punition parce qu'il n'ya pas de règles à ce sujet, est-il juste à la victime? Est-il juste à la victime de la famille? Est-il juste à la notion vérité? La phrase dialectique dernière, est-ce une punition objectif donné à l'assassin? Il est injuste fait qui fait une vie de la fin quelqu'un, et les décideurs n'a pas puni parce qu'il n'y a pas quelques règles de celui-ci. Il n'est pas moyen de trouver la vérité qui peut apporter une foire à tout. Équitable est un objectif n'a, juge doit avoir autre raison à un juge. En cette occasion je vais prend une correction sur le principe de légalité.
Ils sont nombreux règle de base de la législation, il ya dans telles que:
a. Règles de droit international
Règles de droit sont des principes qui ont fait par le gouvernement qui concluent sur ce qui doit être obéir et ce sont réservés aux personnes dans un pays, où il est la sanction / punition à fait état de la société pour devenir l'harmonie, la paix, et équitable.
b. Jurisprudences
Jurisprudences sont des solutions apportées par les juges dans le passé qui devient quelques règles de base pour obtenir une solution dans certains cas. Les cas sont généralement des cas similaires. Jurisprudences utilisé si le tribunal a trouvé quelques cas similaires où il difficile de juger sur la base de règles de lois.
c. Doctrines
Doctrines sont les opinions des experts du droit. Expert en droit ont le droit de remplir leur opinion pour résoudre une affaire. Qui qui aident le juge si elle n'est pas expert en droit?
d. Normes
Les normes sont ce que les gens ne habituellement, il deviennent des règles qui ont utilisé pour résoudre des cas. Normes simplement donner une sanction. Normes ne sont pas "pointu" que les règles des lois.
e. International Costumes
Costumes internationaux sont des règles qui pris par les pays pour résoudre le problème international fondé sur les côtés habituellement.
f. Lois recherches
Lois recherches sont les règles de droit font de la recherche en profondeur. Il faut analyser en profondeur du sujet connexe.
Dans les juridictions de droit généralement créées pour résoudre les cas de rendre la justice dans tout sujet, ils sont coupables et fabricant de conclure victime. Les lois ne peuvent solution subjective, et à seulement tenir un sujet. Il doit des solutions objectives.
Principes de Légalité Principales
Selon Roelof Haveman H "loi, la rétroactivité, Lex Certa, et l'analogie que l'on peut dire que chaque aspect, c'est que fort sur son propre, la combinaison des quatre aspects donne un sens plus vrai au principe de la légalité dans les lois". Donc, une punition doit être composé de tous les aspects connexes. Tous les aspects doivent être considérés pour juger dans les lois faites.
a. Droit
La vie est dynamique, tout changement si rapide. Dans la société de personnes, il ya quelque chose change et le changement. Parce que les besoins humains sont larges et beaucoup. Donc, ne à la loi, il doit se prononcer tout ce changement. La loi n'est pas complète, mais il composante reconstruction de devenir complète règle de base sur la vie humaine. Dans le processus de la loi est non seulement parler de ce qui est écrit sur les règles, mais aussi considérée comme ce ne sont pas écrites sur les règles.
b. Rétroactivité
La rétroactivité est la condition où les lois ne sont pas utilisés pour se prononcer en tant que condition rétroactivité. Dans certains cas, parfois, nous avons trouvé la rétroactivité fait. Il décrit la rétroactivité utilisé pour résoudre au cas certainement. Les juges l'a fait pour construire la justice avec objectivité.
Pour les cas de l'humanité un tel génocide, la non-rétroactivité sont ne peuvent pas être utilisés pour résoudre le problème. Il doit prendre en considération tous les aspects liés à l'affaire.
c. Lex Certa
Toutes les lois doivent faire avec les interprétations de droite et de clarté. Si la loi fait avec pas clairement l'interprétation (abstraitement sens), la loi sera l'interprétation par les composants de la loi subjectivement, tout dépendra de leur propre interprétation. Il n'y a pas de façon objective.
Loi fait clairement état de trouver, entre les «noirs» et «blanc». C'est la raison pour laquelle la loi doit avoir clairement sens.
d. Analogie
Analogie doit faire pour les composants de la loi pour faire une solution loi. La solution est objectivement chose.
Composante principale dans la loi sont la règle et de fait. Les deux d'entre eux doit tenir compte de la valeur de la justice. Si dans les cas reconnus coupables que n'a pas régné avant, de sorte juge doit considérer au sujet de la valeur d'autres, comme la vérité; condition; motif; juste, et l'humanité.
Parce que les principes de la légalité ne peut pas être utilisé avec nuisible. Loi a besoin d'éléments connexes pour donner une solution à résoudre le cas. Non seulement le texte complet, mais doit tenir compte de toutes les valeurs. Nous espérons que la loi peut être un des besoins généraux pour l'homme, parce que la fonction du droit est pour la bonté humaine. Viva la justice!
Traducción - inglés “Correction to Legality Principle”
Author: Arif Basukianto, SH
Legality principle is a principle in law where someone can be judged when his fault is ruled before his fault did by him. A lot of countries are concept it as base rule in their law. This principle is used in common cases and become a basic way to find the truth. They may be forget about the truth concept is need a fair. A fair can be made if every guilty is executed by a right punishment. When the guilty is being “to not touch” or in other words is not given a punishment, is it called fair? Let’s check a sample, if a murder hasn’t ruled and the victim is dead, where the murderer is not given a punishment because there are no rules about it, is it fair to the victim? Is it fair to the family’s victim? Is it fair to the truth concept? The last dialectic sentence, is it an objective punishment given to the murderer? There is unfair did that makes a life of someone end, and the makers has not punished because there is not have a rules of it. It not way to find the truth that can bring a fair to all. Fair is an objective did, judge must have other reason to a justice. In this opportunity I’ll takes a correction about the legality principle.
They are many basic rule of laws, there are in such as:
a. Laws rules
Laws rules are principles that made by government that conclude about what must be obey and what are restricted to people in a country, where there is sanction/ punishment to makes society condition to become harmony, peace, and fair.
b. Jurisprudences
Jurisprudences are solutions made by judges in the past that becomes some basic rules to get solution for some cases. The cases are usually similar cases. Jurisprudences used if in court found some similar cases where it difficult to judge based on laws rules.
c. Doctrines
Doctrines are opinions from law expert. Law expert have the right to fill out their opinion to solve a case. Who that help the judge if not law expert?
d. Norms
Norms are what people did usually, it become rules that used to solve cases. Norms just give sanction. Norms are not “sharp” than laws rules.
e. International Costumes
International costumes are rules that made by countries to solve international problem based on usually sides.
f. Laws researches
Laws researches are law rules are making from deeply research. It need deeply analyze from related subject.
In law jurisdictions usually created to solve cases to give justice in all subject, they are conclude guilty maker and victim. Laws can not subjective solution, just only hold one subject. It must objective solutions.
Legality Principles Main
According Roelof H Haveman “Law, Retroactivity, Lex Certa, and Analogy though it might be said that not every aspect is that strong on its own, the combination of the four aspects gives a more true meaning to principle of legality in laws”. So a punishment must consist of all related aspects. All aspects must be considered to judge in made laws.
a. Law
Life is dynamic, everything change so fast. In people society, there is something change and change. Because the human needs are wide and lot. So did with the law, it must rule everything that change. Law is not complete component but it rebuild to become complete basic rule on human life. In law process is not only talk about what are written on rules, but also considered what are not written on rules.
b. Retroactivity
Retroactivity is condition where laws are not being used to rule as retroactivity condition. In some cases sometimes we found retroactivity did. It described retroactivity used to solve to certainly cases. Judges did it to build up the justice with objectively.
For humanity cases such genocide, non-retroactivity are can not be used to solve the problem. It must consider all aspects related with the case.
c. Lex Certa
All laws must make with right and clearly interpretations. If law made with not clearly interpretation (abstractly meaning), law will be interpretation by law components subjectively, all depend their own interpretation. There is no objectively.
Law made to find clearly condition, between “black” and “white”. It’s the reason why law must have clearly meaning.
d. Analogy
Analogy must do for law components to make law solution. The solution is objectively thing.
Main component in law are rule and fact. Both of them must consider justice value. If in the cases found guilty that’s has not ruled before, so judge must consider about other value, such as truth; condition; motive; fair; and humanity.
Because of that legality principles can not be used with harmfully. Law needs related elements to give solution in solve case. Not only text booked, but must consider all values. We hope law can be a general needs for human, because law’s function is for human kindness. Viva justice!
alemán al inglés: "Korrektur zum Legalitätsprinzip" Detailed field: Derecho: (general)
Texto de origen - alemán "Korrektur zum Legalitätsprinzip"
Autor: Arif Basukianto, SH
Das Legalitätsprinzip ist ein Grundsatz im Gesetz, wo jemand beurteilen, wenn seine Schuld regiert wird, bevor seine Schuld getan, indem wir ihn werden können. Viele Länder sind Konzept als Basis der Regel in ihrem Gesetz. Dieses Prinzip wird in gewöhnlichen Fällen benutzt werden und eine grundlegende Art und Weise, die Wahrheit zu finden. Es kann sich dabei vergessen, über die Wahrheit Konzept ist brauchen eine Messe. Eine Messe kann jeder schuldig gemacht, wenn durch eine richtige Strafe ausgeführt wird. Wenn der Schuldige wird als "nicht zu berühren" oder in anderen Worten ist keine Strafe gegeben, heißt es fair? Lassen Sie uns prüfen eine Probe, wenn ein Mord nicht ausgeschlossen hat und das Opfer tot ist, wo der Mörder ist keine Strafe gegeben, weil es keine Regeln darüber sind, ist es fair für das Opfer? Ist es fair, die Familie Opfer? Ist es fair, die Wahrheit Konzept? Der letzte Satz Dialektik, ist es ein Ziel Strafe, die dem Mörder? Es ist unfair, tat das macht ein Leben von jemand Ende, und die Macher noch nicht bestraft, weil es nicht auf einem festen Regelwerk davon. Es ist nicht so, um die Wahrheit, die einen fairen, alle bringen kann zu finden. Messe ist ein Ziel hat, Richter muss aus anderen Gründen auf einen Gerechtigkeitssinn haben. In dieser Gelegenheit werde ich eine Korrektur erfolgt über das Legalitätsprinzip.
Sie sind viele Grundregel der Gesetze gibt es in z. B.:
a. Laws Regeln
Laws Regeln sind Prinzipien, die von der Regierung gemacht, die über das, was muss gehorchen und was sind die Menschen in einem Land beschränkt, in denen es Sanktionen / Strafen zu Gesellschaft macht Zustand der Harmonie, des Friedens und fairen geworden abzuschließen.
b. Rechtsprechungen
Rechtsprechungen sind Lösungen von den Richtern in der Vergangenheit, die einige grundlegende Regeln zu Lösung für manchen Fällen erhalten wird gemacht. Die Fälle sind in der Regel ähnliche Fälle. Rechtsprechungen verwendet werden, wenn im Gericht stellte fest, einige ähnliche Fälle, in denen es schwierig, basierend auf Gesetzen Regeln zu beurteilen.
c. Lehren
Lehren sind Meinungen von Rechts-Experte. Law Experten haben das Recht, ihre Meinung ausfüllen, um einen Fall zu lösen. Wer helfen, dass die Richter nicht, wenn Rechts-Experte?
d. Normen
Normen sind, was die Leute haben in der Regel, es Regeln, die Fälle zu lösen verwendet werden. Normen geben nur sanktionieren. Normen sind nicht "scharf" als Gesetze Regeln.
E. Internationale Kostüme
Internationale Kostüme sind Regeln, die von Ländern gemacht, um internationales Problem in der Regel auf Seiten der Basis zu lösen.
f. Laws Forschungen
Laws Forschungen sind gesetzlich Regeln werden von tief Forschung machen. Es müssen tief analysieren aus verwandten Fach.
In der Regel gesetzlich Gerichtsbarkeiten geschaffen, um Fälle zu lösen, um Gerechtigkeit in allen Unterrichtsfächern zu geben, sind sie zu dem Schluss schuldig Maker und Opfer. Gesetze können nicht subjektive Lösung, einfach nur ein Thema halten. Es müssen objektive Lösungen.
Rechtmäßigkeit Principles Startseite
Nach Roelof H Haveman "Gesetz, Rückwirkungsverbot, Lex Certa und Analogie es auch sein mag, dass nicht jeder Aspekt, dass starke alleine ist, gibt die Kombination der vier Aspekte eine wahre Bedeutung zu Grundsatz der Gesetzmäßigkeit der Gesetze". Also muss eine Strafe von allen Aspekten bestehen. Alle Aspekte müssen berücksichtigt, um in Gesetze gemacht werden, zu beurteilen.
a. Gesetz
Das Leben ist dynamisch, alles so schnell ändern. Bei Menschen, die Gesellschaft, es ist etwas Veränderung und Wandel. Weil die menschlichen Bedürfnisse sind groß und viel. So kam mit dem Gesetz, muss er alles beherrschen, dass der Wandel. Gesetz ist nicht vollständig Komponente, aber es wieder aufzubauen, um eine vollständige Grundregel des menschlichen Lebens geworden. Im Gesetz wird nicht nur über das, was sich auf Regeln geschrieben zu reden, aber auch darüber nachgedacht, was sich nicht auf Regeln geschrieben.
b. Rückwirkung
Rückwirkung ist Zustand, in dem Gesetze nicht verwendet werden, um als Rückwirkung Zustand herrschen. In einigen Fällen fanden wir manchmal Rückwirkung tat. Er beschrieb das Rückwirkungsverbot verwendet, um sicher Fälle zu lösen. Die Richter haben es zum Aufbau der Justiz mit objektiv.
Für die Menschheit Fällen wie Völkermord, sind das Rückwirkungsverbot kann nicht verwendet werden, um das Problem zu lösen. Es müssen alle Aspekte im Zusammenhang mit dem Fall.
c. Lex Certa
Alle Gesetze müssen mit rechts und klar Interpretationen vornehmen. Wenn mit Recht nicht eindeutig Interpretation (abstrakt Bedeutung) gemacht, sein Gesetz wird Interpretation durch das Gesetz Komponenten subjektiv, hängen alle ihre eigene Interpretation. Es gibt keine objektiv.
Law machte klar Zustand zu finden, zwischen "Schwarz" und "Weiß". Es ist der Grund, warum Recht haben muss eindeutig Sinn.
d. Analogie
Analog muss für Recht Komponenten zu tun, um Recht-Lösung zu machen. Die Lösung ist objektiv Sache.
Hauptkomponente im Recht sind Regel und Tat. Beide müssen überlegen Gerechtigkeit Wert. Bedingung;; Motiv, fair, und Menschheit, wenn in den Fällen für schuldig befunden, dass die noch nicht entschieden, vor, so müssen Richter über andere Wert, wie Wahrheit zu betrachten.
Durch diese Gesetzmäßigkeit Prinzipien nicht mit schädlich verwendet werden. Gesetz braucht verwandte Elemente zu lösen Lösung in Fall geben. Nicht nur Text gebucht, sondern muss alle Werte berücksichtigen. Wir hoffen, Gesetz kann eine allgemeine Bedarf an Personal, denn Recht hat die Aufgabe, für die menschliche Güte. Viva Gerechtigkeit!
Traducción - inglés “Correction to Legality Principle”
Author: Arif Basukianto, SH
Legality principle is a principle in law where someone can be judged when his fault is ruled before his fault did by him. A lot of countries are concept it as base rule in their law. This principle is used in common cases and become a basic way to find the truth. They may be forget about the truth concept is need a fair. A fair can be made if every guilty is executed by a right punishment. When the guilty is being “to not touch” or in other words is not given a punishment, is it called fair? Let’s check a sample, if a murder hasn’t ruled and the victim is dead, where the murderer is not given a punishment because there are no rules about it, is it fair to the victim? Is it fair to the family’s victim? Is it fair to the truth concept? The last dialectic sentence, is it an objective punishment given to the murderer? There is unfair did that makes a life of someone end, and the makers has not punished because there is not have a rules of it. It not way to find the truth that can bring a fair to all. Fair is an objective did, judge must have other reason to a justice. In this opportunity I’ll takes a correction about the legality principle.
They are many basic rule of laws, there are in such as:
a. Laws rules
Laws rules are principles that made by government that conclude about what must be obey and what are restricted to people in a country, where there is sanction/ punishment to makes society condition to become harmony, peace, and fair.
b. Jurisprudences
Jurisprudences are solutions made by judges in the past that becomes some basic rules to get solution for some cases. The cases are usually similar cases. Jurisprudences used if in court found some similar cases where it difficult to judge based on laws rules.
c. Doctrines
Doctrines are opinions from law expert. Law expert have the right to fill out their opinion to solve a case. Who that help the judge if not law expert?
d. Norms
Norms are what people did usually, it become rules that used to solve cases. Norms just give sanction. Norms are not “sharp” than laws rules.
e. International Costumes
International costumes are rules that made by countries to solve international problem based on usually sides.
f. Laws researches
Laws researches are law rules are making from deeply research. It need deeply analyze from related subject.
In law jurisdictions usually created to solve cases to give justice in all subject, they are conclude guilty maker and victim. Laws can not subjective solution, just only hold one subject. It must objective solutions.
Legality Principles Main
According Roelof H Haveman “Law, Retroactivity, Lex Certa, and Analogy though it might be said that not every aspect is that strong on its own, the combination of the four aspects gives a more true meaning to principle of legality in laws”. So a punishment must consist of all related aspects. All aspects must be considered to judge in made laws.
a. Law
Life is dynamic, everything change so fast. In people society, there is something change and change. Because the human needs are wide and lot. So did with the law, it must rule everything that change. Law is not complete component but it rebuild to become complete basic rule on human life. In law process is not only talk about what are written on rules, but also considered what are not written on rules.
b. Retroactivity
Retroactivity is condition where laws are not being used to rule as retroactivity condition. In some cases sometimes we found retroactivity did. It described retroactivity used to solve to certainly cases. Judges did it to build up the justice with objectively.
For humanity cases such genocide, non-retroactivity are can not be used to solve the problem. It must consider all aspects related with the case.
c. Lex Certa
All laws must make with right and clearly interpretations. If law made with not clearly interpretation (abstractly meaning), law will be interpretation by law components subjectively, all depend their own interpretation. There is no objectively.
Law made to find clearly condition, between “black” and “white”. It’s the reason why law must have clearly meaning.
d. Analogy
Analogy must do for law components to make law solution. The solution is objectively thing.
Main component in law are rule and fact. Both of them must consider justice value. If in the cases found guilty that’s has not ruled before, so judge must consider about other value, such as truth; condition; motive; fair; and humanity.
Because of that legality principles can not be used with harmfully. Law needs related elements to give solution in solve case. Not only text booked, but must consider all values. We hope law can be a general needs for human, because law’s function is for human kindness. Viva justice!
español al inglés: "Corrección de Principio de legalidad" Detailed field: Derecho: (general)
Texto de origen - español "Corrección de Principio de legalidad"
Autor: Arif Basukianto, SH
Principio de legalidad es un principio en la ley en la que alguien puede ser juzgado por su culpa, cuando se descarta antes de su fallo hizo por él. Una gran cantidad de países el concepto como base de reglas en su legislación. Este principio se utiliza en los casos comunes y se convierten en una forma básica de encontrar la verdad. Pueden ser olvidarse del concepto de verdad es necesario una feria. Una feria se puede hacer si todos los culpables es ejecutado por un justo castigo. Cuando el culpable es ser "no tocar" o en otras palabras, no se le da un castigo, se le llama justo? Vamos a ver una muestra, si un asesinato no se ha pronunciado y la víctima está muerta, donde el asesino no se le da un castigo porque no hay reglas al respecto, es justo a la víctima? ¿Es justo a la víctima de la familia? ¿Es justo el concepto de verdad? La sentencia dialéctica pasado, es un castigo objetivo dado con el asesino? No es justo que lo hizo hace una vida de extremo a alguien, y los fabricantes no se ha castigado porque no hay tienen algunas reglas de la misma. No manera de encontrar la verdad que puede traer una feria para todos.
Justo es un objetivo lo hizo, el juez debe tener otra razón para un juez. En esta oportunidad voy a lleva a una corrección sobre el principio de legalidad.
Son muchas la regla básica de las leyes, no se encuentran en tales como:
a. Leyes normas
Las leyes y normas son principios que han hecho por el gobierno que concluyen sobre lo que debe obedecer y lo que se limitan a las personas en un país, donde no hay sanción / castigo a condición de que hace la sociedad para convertirse en la armonía, la paz y justo.
b. Jurisprudencias
Jurisprudencias son soluciones hechas por los jueces en el pasado que se convierte en algunas reglas básicas para obtener una solución para algunos casos. Los casos suelen ser casos similares. Jurisprudencias utilizarse si el tribunal encontró algunos casos similares en los que resulta difícil juzgar sobre la base de leyes.
c. Doctrinas
Las doctrinas son las opiniones de experto en derecho. Experto en la Ley tienen derecho a completar su opinión para resolver un caso. ¿Quién que ayudar al juez si no es experto en derecho?
d. Normas
Las normas son lo que la gente tenía por lo general, se convierten en reglas que se utilizan para resolver los casos. Normas acaba de dar sanción. Las normas no son "fuerte" que las reglas de las leyes.
e. Internacional Disfraces
Trajes internacionales son normas que han hecho los países para resolver el problema internacional basado en lo general los lados.
f. Leyes investigaciones
Las leyes son normas de derecho investigaciones están haciendo de la profunda investigación. Es necesario analizar en profundidad del tema relacionado.
En las jurisdicciones de derecho generalmente creadas para resolver los casos de hacer justicia en todos los sujetos, que son la conclusión de fabricante de culpables y la víctima. Las leyes no pueden solución subjetiva, simplemente sólo tienen un tema. Se debe soluciones objetivas.
Principios de Legalidad Principales
Según Roelof Haveman H "Derecho, Retroactividad, lex certa y la analogía, aunque se podría decir que no todos los aspectos es tan fuerte por sí solo, la combinación de los cuatro aspectos da un significado más fiel a los principios de la legalidad en las leyes". Así que un castigo debe consistir en todos los aspectos relacionados. Todos los aspectos deben ser considerados para juzgar en las leyes hechas.
a. Ley
La vida es dinámica, cambia todo tan rápido. En la sociedad de las personas, no hay cambio de algo y el cambio. Debido a que las necesidades humanas son amplios y mucho. Así que, ¿con la ley, se debe descartar todo lo que el cambio. La ley no es un componente completo, pero su reconstrucción para convertirse en la regla básica completa sobre la vida humana. En el proceso de la ley no sólo es hablar de lo que se han escrito sobre las normas, pero también se considera lo que no están escritas en las reglas.
b. Retroactividad
Retroactividad es una condición donde las leyes no están siendo utilizados para gobernar como condición de la retroactividad. En algunos casos, a veces, encontramos la retroactividad hizo. Se describe la retroactividad para resolver los casos de duda. Los jueces lo hizo para construir la justicia con objetividad.
Para los casos de la humanidad genocidio tal, irretroactividad no se puede utilizar para resolver el problema. Debe tenerse en cuenta todos los aspectos relacionados con el caso.
c. Lex certa
Todas las leyes deben hacer con interpretaciones correctas y con claridad. Si la ley no muy bien hecha la interpretación (en abstracto significado), la ley será la interpretación de la ley por los componentes de forma subjetiva, todo depende de su propia interpretación. No hay objetivamente.
Ley hizo para encontrar claridad condición, entre el "negro" y "blanco". Es la razón por la cual la ley debe tener claro el significado.
d. Analogía
La analogía tiene que hacer para los componentes de la ley para hacer una solución ley. La solución es objetivamente algo.
El componente principal de la ley son la regla y el hecho. Ambos deben considerar el valor de la justicia. Si en los casos declarados culpables de que no se ha pronunciado antes, así que el juez debe tener en cuenta sobre el valor de otra, como la verdad, condición, motivo; justo, y la humanidad.
Debido a que los principios de la legalidad no se puede utilizar con perjudicialmente. Ley de los elementos relacionados con las necesidades para dar solución en resolver el caso. No sólo el texto reservado, pero debe tener en cuenta todos los valores. Esperamos que la ley puede ser una las necesidades generales de desarrollo humano, porque la función de la ley es de la bondad humana. Viva la justicia!
Traducción - inglés “Correction to Legality Principle”
Author: Arif Basukianto, SH
Legality principle is a principle in law where someone can be judged when his fault is ruled before his fault did by him. A lot of countries are concept it as base rule in their law. This principle is used in common cases and become a basic way to find the truth. They may be forget about the truth concept is need a fair. A fair can be made if every guilty is executed by a right punishment. When the guilty is being “to not touch” or in other words is not given a punishment, is it called fair? Let’s check a sample, if a murder hasn’t ruled and the victim is dead, where the murderer is not given a punishment because there are no rules about it, is it fair to the victim? Is it fair to the family’s victim? Is it fair to the truth concept? The last dialectic sentence, is it an objective punishment given to the murderer? There is unfair did that makes a life of someone end, and the makers has not punished because there is not have a rules of it. It not way to find the truth that can bring a fair to all. Fair is an objective did, judge must have other reason to a justice. In this opportunity I’ll takes a correction about the legality principle.
They are many basic rule of laws, there are in such as:
a. Laws rules
Laws rules are principles that made by government that conclude about what must be obey and what are restricted to people in a country, where there is sanction/ punishment to makes society condition to become harmony, peace, and fair.
b. Jurisprudences
Jurisprudences are solutions made by judges in the past that becomes some basic rules to get solution for some cases. The cases are usually similar cases. Jurisprudences used if in court found some similar cases where it difficult to judge based on laws rules.
c. Doctrines
Doctrines are opinions from law expert. Law expert have the right to fill out their opinion to solve a case. Who that help the judge if not law expert?
d. Norms
Norms are what people did usually, it become rules that used to solve cases. Norms just give sanction. Norms are not “sharp” than laws rules.
e. International Costumes
International costumes are rules that made by countries to solve international problem based on usually sides.
f. Laws researches
Laws researches are law rules are making from deeply research. It need deeply analyze from related subject.
In law jurisdictions usually created to solve cases to give justice in all subject, they are conclude guilty maker and victim. Laws can not subjective solution, just only hold one subject. It must objective solutions.
Legality Principles Main
According Roelof H Haveman “Law, Retroactivity, Lex Certa, and Analogy though it might be said that not every aspect is that strong on its own, the combination of the four aspects gives a more true meaning to principle of legality in laws”. So a punishment must consist of all related aspects. All aspects must be considered to judge in made laws.
a. Law
Life is dynamic, everything change so fast. In people society, there is something change and change. Because the human needs are wide and lot. So did with the law, it must rule everything that change. Law is not complete component but it rebuild to become complete basic rule on human life. In law process is not only talk about what are written on rules, but also considered what are not written on rules.
b. Retroactivity
Retroactivity is condition where laws are not being used to rule as retroactivity condition. In some cases sometimes we found retroactivity did. It described retroactivity used to solve to certainly cases. Judges did it to build up the justice with objectively.
For humanity cases such genocide, non-retroactivity are can not be used to solve the problem. It must consider all aspects related with the case.
c. Lex Certa
All laws must make with right and clearly interpretations. If law made with not clearly interpretation (abstractly meaning), law will be interpretation by law components subjectively, all depend their own interpretation. There is no objectively.
Law made to find clearly condition, between “black” and “white”. It’s the reason why law must have clearly meaning.
d. Analogy
Analogy must do for law components to make law solution. The solution is objectively thing.
Main component in law are rule and fact. Both of them must consider justice value. If in the cases found guilty that’s has not ruled before, so judge must consider about other value, such as truth; condition; motive; fair; and humanity.
Because of that legality principles can not be used with harmfully. Law needs related elements to give solution in solve case. Not only text booked, but must consider all values. We hope law can be a general needs for human, because law’s function is for human kindness. Viva justice!
More
Less
Formación en el ámbito de la traducción
Bachelor's degree - UNS
Experiencia
Años de experiencia: 20 Registrado en ProZ.com: Jun 2012
Name : Arif Basukianto, SH
Birth : February 15, 1985
Last Education : Bachelor Degree of Law
Address : Dagen Suruh RT 06 RW 07 Tasikmadu Karanganyar Jawa Tengah Indonesia
Serttificate : Sertificate with Good criteria (English, Ducth, Spanish, Latin, German, Portugis, Tagalog/ Pilipino)
Email : [email protected]
Facebook : arifbasuky
Phone : +6285329076535
Experience : (1) Translator (9 Years Experience)
- Indonesia to English
- English to Indonesia
- Malay to English
- German to English
- Dutch to English
- Spanish to English
- Latin to English
- Pilipino (Tagalog) to English
- Portugis to English
(2) Editor (5 Years experience)
(3) Legal Drafter (4 Years experience)
(4) Online Researcher (3 Years experience)
(5) Online Writer ( 2 Yeras experience)
(6) Data Maker (5 Years experience)
Metode Payment : Paypal
Salary Wanted : 150$ USD per project
