Mar 18, 2005 15:36
19 yrs ago
Greek term
έχει ταχθεί απόδειξη
Greek to English
Bus/Financial
Law: Contract(s)
In a judgement of the court - it has something to do with a request by the court giving the judgement for clarification of the laws of another country. So, possibly,"...evidence has been sought..." or something similar.
Proposed translations
(English)
| 3 +6 | evidence has been called |
Dylan Edwards
|
| 3 | evidence has been defined |
Vicky Papaprodromou
|
| 3 | producing/collection of evidence has been ordered |
Andras Mohay (X)
|
Proposed translations
+6
2 hrs
Dylan Edwards
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Native in English
United Kingdom
Native in: English (Variant: British) 
Works in: Greek to English, Czech to English, Slovak to English, and 1 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
32
Greek term (edited):
��� ����� �������
Selected
evidence has been called
Another option for you to consider.
There's "(order for the) taking of evidence", a phrase which is widely used, but doesn't fit very neatly here.
I was searching for τάχθηκε απόδειξη and related phrases, trying to jog my memory, and then thought of "has been called".
In cases where the right of reply depends upon the question whether evidence
has been called for the defence, the fact that the person charged has been ...
acts2.oireachtas.ie/zza37y1924.1.html
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs 48 mins (2005-03-18 18:24:51 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Although no evidence was called in respect of the second proposition Mr Addison
did say that evidence could be called if needed. ...
www.airc.gov.au/alldocuments/PR904393.htm
37 There is no absolute rule that evidence must be called on the issue of
necessity. Where it is apparent from the circumstances before the trial judge ...
www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/1999/1999scc64.html
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs 0 min (2005-03-18 18:36:32 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Perhaps, after all, \"taking of evidence\" is all right, as used in the following sentence:
which are in no way relevant to the subject-matter for which the taking of
evidence has been ordered, or if they aim at establishing facts in respect of ...
www.european-patent-office.org/ legal/gui_lines/e/e_iv_1_6_7.htm
There's "(order for the) taking of evidence", a phrase which is widely used, but doesn't fit very neatly here.
I was searching for τάχθηκε απόδειξη and related phrases, trying to jog my memory, and then thought of "has been called".
In cases where the right of reply depends upon the question whether evidence
has been called for the defence, the fact that the person charged has been ...
acts2.oireachtas.ie/zza37y1924.1.html
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs 48 mins (2005-03-18 18:24:51 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Although no evidence was called in respect of the second proposition Mr Addison
did say that evidence could be called if needed. ...
www.airc.gov.au/alldocuments/PR904393.htm
37 There is no absolute rule that evidence must be called on the issue of
necessity. Where it is apparent from the circumstances before the trial judge ...
www.canlii.org/ca/cas/scc/1999/1999scc64.html
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs 0 min (2005-03-18 18:36:32 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Perhaps, after all, \"taking of evidence\" is all right, as used in the following sentence:
which are in no way relevant to the subject-matter for which the taking of
evidence has been ordered, or if they aim at establishing facts in respect of ...
www.european-patent-office.org/ legal/gui_lines/e/e_iv_1_6_7.htm
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
Vicky Papaprodromou
1 hr
|
|
Thank you
|
|
| agree |
Andras Mohay (X)
3 hrs
|
|
Thank you
|
|
| agree |
Elena Petelos
: ...set(ting) forth(?)/The question is not whether "set forth" and "call" are used -they are and of course we say "calling evidence" in a Ct.- but rather, if that's what's meant in Gr. source, e.g. http://tinyurl.com/4wzhw Apol., but I am not sure at all.
4 hrs
|
|
Thank you. There's certainly the phrase "set forth the evidence", but as far as I know, "taking of evidence" or "evidence-taking" is the standard term for part of the court procedure.
|
|
| agree |
Lamprini Kosma
19 hrs
|
|
Thank you
|
|
| agree |
Assimina Vavoula
1 day 13 hrs
|
|
Thank you
|
|
| agree |
Stavroula Giannopoulou
1 day 15 hrs
|
|
Thank you
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thankyou, Dylan.This seems to give the best sense in the context. Much appreciated."
1 hr
Vicky Papaprodromou
Greece
Greece
Native in Greek
Greece
hellenic wings in translation
Native in: Greek
Works in: English to Greek, Greek to English
Related KudoZ points
:
54
Greek term (edited):
��� ����� �������
evidence has been defined
EVIDENCE DEFINED
[1] To decide what the facts are in this case, you may consider only the evidence that you hear and see in the courtroom.
[2] The evidence includes what each witness says in response to the questions asked. The questions themselves are not evidence unless the witness agrees that what is asked is correct. The answers are the evidence.
[3] The evidence also includes any things that may be made exhibits. When you go to your jury room to decide this case, the exhibits will go with you.
[4] We permit, but do not require the lawyers to make admissions about matters of fact. When admissions are made, no evidence is required about any fact that is admitted. Whatever the lawyers admit as a fact is a fact in this case.
[5] There are also some things that are not evidence. You must not consider or rely upon them to decide this case.
[6] For example, the charge(s) that you heard read out when we started this case is (are) not evidence. What the lawyers and I say when we speak to you during the trial is not evidence. Only the exhibits and the things witnesses say are evidence.
[7] Radio, television, newspaper and Internet reports or anything that you may have heard from anyone else about this case, or the persons or places involved in it, are not evidence. You should ignore them completely. You should avoid all media and other coverage of this case and not discuss this with anyone else.
www.criminallawyers.ca/juryinstructions/ JuryPrelim/PRELIM.16.doc
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr 37 mins (2005-03-18 17:14:01 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
\"Tάσσω\" means \"define, specify, set\", not \"seek\" but I don\'t know if \"defined evidence\" is the standard phrase in legal terminologoy.
[1] To decide what the facts are in this case, you may consider only the evidence that you hear and see in the courtroom.
[2] The evidence includes what each witness says in response to the questions asked. The questions themselves are not evidence unless the witness agrees that what is asked is correct. The answers are the evidence.
[3] The evidence also includes any things that may be made exhibits. When you go to your jury room to decide this case, the exhibits will go with you.
[4] We permit, but do not require the lawyers to make admissions about matters of fact. When admissions are made, no evidence is required about any fact that is admitted. Whatever the lawyers admit as a fact is a fact in this case.
[5] There are also some things that are not evidence. You must not consider or rely upon them to decide this case.
[6] For example, the charge(s) that you heard read out when we started this case is (are) not evidence. What the lawyers and I say when we speak to you during the trial is not evidence. Only the exhibits and the things witnesses say are evidence.
[7] Radio, television, newspaper and Internet reports or anything that you may have heard from anyone else about this case, or the persons or places involved in it, are not evidence. You should ignore them completely. You should avoid all media and other coverage of this case and not discuss this with anyone else.
www.criminallawyers.ca/juryinstructions/ JuryPrelim/PRELIM.16.doc
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr 37 mins (2005-03-18 17:14:01 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
\"Tάσσω\" means \"define, specify, set\", not \"seek\" but I don\'t know if \"defined evidence\" is the standard phrase in legal terminologoy.
1 hr
Greek term (edited):
Ý÷ĺé ôá÷čĺß áđüäĺé&#
producing/collection of evidence has been ordered
απόδειξη is a noun of action here
Discussion