Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Spanish term or phrase:
propietario consorte
English translation:
spousal co-owner
Added to glossary by
Julie Thompson
Feb 14, 2018 17:07
6 yrs ago
8 viewers *
Spanish term
United States
All languages are bridges.
Native in: English
Works in: Spanish to English, Quechua to English, English to Spanish, and 3 more.
propietario consorte
Spanish to English
Bus/Financial
Real Estate
real estate term
Good afternoon. This phrase is a case of 'I know what it means, but I can't think of what the Spanish phrase would be'.
Here's the context:
Con su boda y con el paso del tiempo, 'Señor Fulano' se convirtió también en PROPIETARIO CONSORTE de la propiedad, al heredar su esposa, María Esperanza Casals, la finca a la muerte de su madre.
Would it simply be "Part-owner by right of marriage"? As always, a thousand thanks!
Here's the context:
Con su boda y con el paso del tiempo, 'Señor Fulano' se convirtió también en PROPIETARIO CONSORTE de la propiedad, al heredar su esposa, María Esperanza Casals, la finca a la muerte de su madre.
Would it simply be "Part-owner by right of marriage"? As always, a thousand thanks!
Proposed translations
(English)
| 3 +5 | spousal co-owner |
Robert Carter
|
Proposed translations
+5
1 hr
Robert Carter
Mexico
Mexico
Native in English
Mexico
Translating full-time since 1998
Native in: English (Variant: British) 
Works in: Spanish to English
Related KudoZ points
:
91
Selected
spousal co-owner
Just to qualify this by saying there are not many Google hits for this, but I think it may work in any case.
Here is a reference from Louisiana law, where there are many similarities with civil law jurisdictions because of the French influence:
To request the Senate Committee on Judiciary A and the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure to meet and function as a joint committee to continue the study of heirship property; to develop recommendations for facilitating the ability of spousal co-owners of property to receive title to immovable property at one spousal co-owner's death; to review the rights and obligations of spousal co-owners of immovable property in order to prevent undue hardship resulting from successions and probate costs and fees of the first spouse to die; and to review the costs of probate and intrafamily transfers of real estate to determine whether such costs might be reduced for spousal co-owners.
http://appleseednetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/SCSR-...
A couple of other references from the US:
Co-owners
Non-spousal co-owners do not have to meet any income limit for the applicant to qualify for the exemption.
http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/bitstream/handle/2452/70353/...
Supreme Court: Regarding both properties, the court holds that they were subject to seizure, that a full evidentiary preseizure hearing was not required, and that the statute providing for forfeiture of real property used for drug trafficking is facially constitutional and constitutional as applied. In the Rutherford Street case, holding that the State should have been granted a continuance to produce evidence that the spousal co-owner had consented to its unlawful use and that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding attorney fees to the spousal co-owner, the court reverses the summary judgment, award of attorney fees, and denial of the State's CR 56(f) motion.
http://courts.mrsc.org/supreme/120wn2d/120wn2d0068.htm
Here is a reference from Louisiana law, where there are many similarities with civil law jurisdictions because of the French influence:
To request the Senate Committee on Judiciary A and the House Committee on Civil Law and Procedure to meet and function as a joint committee to continue the study of heirship property; to develop recommendations for facilitating the ability of spousal co-owners of property to receive title to immovable property at one spousal co-owner's death; to review the rights and obligations of spousal co-owners of immovable property in order to prevent undue hardship resulting from successions and probate costs and fees of the first spouse to die; and to review the costs of probate and intrafamily transfers of real estate to determine whether such costs might be reduced for spousal co-owners.
http://appleseednetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/SCSR-...
A couple of other references from the US:
Co-owners
Non-spousal co-owners do not have to meet any income limit for the applicant to qualify for the exemption.
http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/bitstream/handle/2452/70353/...
Supreme Court: Regarding both properties, the court holds that they were subject to seizure, that a full evidentiary preseizure hearing was not required, and that the statute providing for forfeiture of real property used for drug trafficking is facially constitutional and constitutional as applied. In the Rutherford Street case, holding that the State should have been granted a continuance to produce evidence that the spousal co-owner had consented to its unlawful use and that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding attorney fees to the spousal co-owner, the court reverses the summary judgment, award of attorney fees, and denial of the State's CR 56(f) motion.
http://courts.mrsc.org/supreme/120wn2d/120wn2d0068.htm
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thanks, Sr. Carter! Your entry fits the context to a tee! "
Something went wrong...