Oct 13, 2013 19:27
10 yrs ago
3 viewers *
Italian term
soggetti giuridici notoriamente creati di fatto a beneficio di
Italian to English
Law/Patents
Business/Commerce (general)
anti-money laundering declaration
Context:
Ai fini dell'individuazione dei soggetti con i quali le persone di cui al numero 1 intrattengono notoriamente stretti legami si fa
riferimento a:
a) qualsiasi persona fisica che ha notoriamente la titolarita' effettiva congiunta di entita' giuridiche o qualsiasi altra stretta
relazione d'affari con una persona di cui al comma 1;
b) qualsiasi persona fisica che sia unica titolare effettiva di entita' giuridiche o soggetti giuridici notoriamente creati di fatto a beneficio della persona di cui al comma 1.
Ai fini dell'individuazione dei soggetti con i quali le persone di cui al numero 1 intrattengono notoriamente stretti legami si fa
riferimento a:
a) qualsiasi persona fisica che ha notoriamente la titolarita' effettiva congiunta di entita' giuridiche o qualsiasi altra stretta
relazione d'affari con una persona di cui al comma 1;
b) qualsiasi persona fisica che sia unica titolare effettiva di entita' giuridiche o soggetti giuridici notoriamente creati di fatto a beneficio della persona di cui al comma 1.
Change log
Oct 13, 2013 19:31: Daniela Zambrini changed "Term asked" from "soggetti giuridici notoriamente creati di fatto a beneficio della persona di cu" to "soggetti giuridici notoriamente creati di fatto a beneficio di"
Oct 13, 2013 19:31: Daniela Zambrini changed "Field" from "Other" to "Law/Patents"
Proposed translations
+4
9 hrs
Selected
legal entities that are known to have been established for the sole benefit of
as I read this the legal entities are not the beneficial owner, it is the person in point 1) that is the beneficial owner of these legal entities
besides the beneficial owner, i.e. the ultimate beneficiary is, as far as I know, an individual and not a legal entity
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 hrs (2013-10-14 05:22:40 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
or indeed you may turn the sentence
legal entities for which the person mentioned in par.1 is the de facto beneficial owner
besides the beneficial owner, i.e. the ultimate beneficiary is, as far as I know, an individual and not a legal entity
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 hrs (2013-10-14 05:22:40 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
or indeed you may turn the sentence
legal entities for which the person mentioned in par.1 is the de facto beneficial owner
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
+1
6 mins
legal entities that are known to have been created with as de facto beneficial owner
Suggestion
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 days (2013-10-29 14:37:22 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
"...legal entity [...] which is known to have been set up for the benefit de facto of..."
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 days (2013-10-29 14:37:22 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------
"...legal entity [...] which is known to have been set up for the benefit de facto of..."
Note from asker:
Yes, you are quite right guys, maybe I did put too many terms in - should have put it in the context box - sorry :( Would have given Thomas 20 points if I could anyway - thanks a million! |
Peer comment(s):
agree |
James (Jim) Davis
: I think there are about five terms here worth 20 points.
1 hr
|
neutral |
Tom in London
: I agree with Jim. Too many terms in 1 question
2 hrs
|
neutral |
CristianaC
: it is the person in point 1) who is the beneficial owner not the legal entity-oops sorry I did not see the "with"-
9 hrs
|
Something went wrong...