Nov 5, 2008 00:32
15 yrs ago
2 viewers *
Danish term
som det mindre i det mere
Danish to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
Defence plea
X bør som det mindre i det mere frifindes for de nedlagte påstande for såvidt angår ....
Proposed translations
(English)
2 | the greater includes the lesser | Christine Andersen |
1 | jeg kender ikke oversættelsen p.t. | Eva Harbo Andersen (X) |
1 | at the most, be at least found innocent (cleared) | Andres Larsen |
References
EU document | William [Bill] Gray |
Proposed translations
12 hrs
Selected
the greater includes the lesser
the greater includes the lesser
-- ser ud til at være ret kontroversiel i den engelsksprogede verden, og forbindes mere med religion end jura, når man søger på nettet, men der er en diskussion her:
http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/mberman/vandy-final.pdf
´on the principle that the greater includes the lesser...´
Det er det nærmeste, jeg kan komme i tanker om.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 hrs (2008-11-05 13:19:07 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Der er endnu et eksempel her:
http://www.fdli.org/pubs/Journal Online/54_4/art4.pdf
Often categorized as “intermediate First Amendment scrutiny,” this balancing test has the problem of providing the courts with enormous discretion. To illustrate, the Supreme Court used this test in Posadas de Puerto Rico5 to uphold a paternalistic restriction on casino advertising directed at anyone but tourists. The Court advanced the widely-criticized argument that “the greater power to completely ban casino gambling necessarily includes the lesser power to ban advertising of casino gambling.” Modern-day state legislatures arguably have the power to outlaw almost any product or service. Thus, if taken seriously, this notion that the “greater-includes-the-lesser” essentially would eliminate protection for commercial speech about any product or service other than those that are constitutionally protected, such as books and movies.
-- ser ud til at være ret kontroversiel i den engelsksprogede verden, og forbindes mere med religion end jura, når man søger på nettet, men der er en diskussion her:
http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/mberman/vandy-final.pdf
´on the principle that the greater includes the lesser...´
Det er det nærmeste, jeg kan komme i tanker om.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 12 hrs (2008-11-05 13:19:07 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Der er endnu et eksempel her:
http://www.fdli.org/pubs/Journal Online/54_4/art4.pdf
Often categorized as “intermediate First Amendment scrutiny,” this balancing test has the problem of providing the courts with enormous discretion. To illustrate, the Supreme Court used this test in Posadas de Puerto Rico5 to uphold a paternalistic restriction on casino advertising directed at anyone but tourists. The Court advanced the widely-criticized argument that “the greater power to completely ban casino gambling necessarily includes the lesser power to ban advertising of casino gambling.” Modern-day state legislatures arguably have the power to outlaw almost any product or service. Thus, if taken seriously, this notion that the “greater-includes-the-lesser” essentially would eliminate protection for commercial speech about any product or service other than those that are constitutionally protected, such as books and movies.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Lidt sent .. men tak for forslaget. "
6 hrs
jeg kender ikke oversættelsen p.t.
... det mindre indgribende altid er indeholdt i den mere indgribende foranstaltning/bevilling
Example sentence:
Dette er særlig relevant når der er tale om principper som ”det mindre i det mere”, altså princippet om, at en bevilling til det mindre indgribende altid er indeholdt i den mere indgribende foranstaltning/bevilling.
13 days
at the most, be at least found innocent (cleared)
X ought (should), for the most, at least be found innocent (be cleared) of the charges brought (before this court) as far as .......is concerned
another way of putting it:
X ought (should), at the most, be, at least, found innocent (cleared) of the charges brought (before this court) as far as......is concerned
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 13 days (2008-11-18 20:57:18 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
rewriting the second suggested translation of your above term:
X ought to be (should be), at the most, at least, found innocent (cleared) of the charges brought (before this court) as far as...... is concerned
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 13 days (2008-11-18 20:59:57 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
a third and final option is:
at the most, X ought/should be at least cleared of those charges brought before this court concerning............
another way of putting it:
X ought (should), at the most, be, at least, found innocent (cleared) of the charges brought (before this court) as far as......is concerned
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 13 days (2008-11-18 20:57:18 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
rewriting the second suggested translation of your above term:
X ought to be (should be), at the most, at least, found innocent (cleared) of the charges brought (before this court) as far as...... is concerned
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 13 days (2008-11-18 20:59:57 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
a third and final option is:
at the most, X ought/should be at least cleared of those charges brought before this court concerning............
Reference comments
7 hrs
Reference:
EU document
This may help you. I'm adding the link here, since it doesn't seem to like it when it's posted in the web-reference field!
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Notice.do?mode=dbl&lang=en&ihmlang=...
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Notice.do?mode=dbl&lang=en&ihmlang=...
Something went wrong...