I would suggest

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 33 mins (2013-09-19 23:56:38 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

obviously figurative here

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 35 mins (2013-09-19 23:58:31 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

or: trouble makers

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 36 mins (2013-09-20 00:00:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

avoids the pointed connotation of "rogue"

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 38 mins (2013-09-20 00:01:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

and keeps the idea of "stören"

Just another suggestion, if you want something a little vague like the GER. It doesn't pin it down to individuals or nations or, indeed, factions within nations. But is the sort of politico-speak we hear all the time.

First off, "rogue state" was not coined by the Bush Jr administration. As early as 1993, the DoD was publishing materials referring to "rogue states," and Clinton even suggested ditching the term in favor of "states of concern." So yes, Bush Jr definitely comes to mind when hearing the term, but if what you're translating is as intended for such a high level of political scientists as it sounds from the passage you quoted, then it should still be ok.

The actual problem I see with using "rogue states" is that the German does not specifically indicate that it's talking about states. "Störer" could be anyone. In IR, when we're trying to be vague about the subject (states, NGOs, individuals, etc), then we generally use the word "actors." So for this case, I would recommend using "rogue actors." If you google it (together with "international," otherwise you'll get a lot of hits from Hollywood articles...), you'll find several respectable references including an article from the Journal of Conflict Resolution (one of the top 10 in IR).

...wherever obstructors (meddlers/subverters/disturbers/mischief-makers) jeopardize the international order..

See example below:
"China risks gaining a reputation as an obstructor of international deal making."
"For many years after the Russian Revolution of 1917, Soviet Communism had been widely viewed as the principal subverter of international stability."

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day4 hrs (2013-09-21 04:16:00 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

I found a few more options that may be usable in this context. Pariah state, for instance, is closely associated with "rogue state" but some will draw the distinction that pariah states are less likely to pose a military threat to their neighbours than "rogue states."

1. pariahs or pariah states:
"Insecurities about conventional arms sources and big-power support in crises involving national survival have driven pariahs to consideration of nuclear “equalizers,” notwithstanding dilemmas involving the viability of applicable nuclear strategic doctrines." http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract;jsessio...

2. recalcitrant states (here: noun)
"..the constructivist/English school argument on the ability of norms and institutions to force recalcitrant states to change their behaviour becomes more credible. Arguably, countries such as Pakistan or Iran will not be able to indefinitely ignore the norm of disarmament if it is reinforced at the global level http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13523260.2013.776...

3. spoiler countries or obstructionist countries
"Human Rights Watch, Oxfam International and Amnesty International call on a small number of “spoiler” countries to stop holding the UN World Summit hostage over crucial measures on human rights, security, genocide and poverty reduction." http://www.hrw.org/news/2005/09/06/small-number-countries-ho...